A | The CAS held the first of two planned hearings of the Football Union of Russia and club teams’ appeal of a FIFA/UEFA ban from UEFA competition on Tuesday.,Tuesday’s hearing, taking place in Lausanne, Switzerland, will be followed by a second hearing next Monday by four Russian clubs, including Zenit St. Petersburg, the reigning Russian Premier League champions, challenging their exclusion from UEFA competition.,UEFA ruled in May to bar Russian football clubs from all tournaments, including men’s teams and the women’s team for the FIFA Women’s World Cup 2023. At least for the remainder of the current season, Russian teams have been banned from the UEFA Champions League, Europa League, Europa Conference League, Women’s Champions League, and Youth League. The Russian bid to host the Euro 2028 and/or Euro 2032 events has also been preemptively rejected.,In arbitration filed in March, the Football Union of Russia demanded the immediate reinstatement of all teams for competition, arguing the “irreparable harm” that their exclusion would have on tournaments, including the FIFA World Cup, potential sponsorship losses, loss of experience, and loss of opportunity to compete against opponents of high standard. The Russian side also stressed that for players 30 years old or older, the 2022 World Cup constituted “the last chance of their career to play such a tournament.”,Former Formula One Boss Ecclestone Backs Putin Over Conflict With Ukraine30 June, 12:39 GMT,The football union argued that the International Olympic Committee resolution issued in February demanding that Russian athletes and officials be barred from international competition on which FIFA and UEFA based their decisions was “generic,” “does not refer to any legal provision and is not binding upon FIFA,” and that sporting authorities were acting in a “discriminatory” manner by barring Russian players.,FIFA argued that Russian teams’ presence or absence in the World Cup and the Women’s World Cup was “not guaranteed,” and dismissed the fact that some players would miss out on their last chance for their World Cup play as “irrelevant.” Furthermore, the association argued that “pursuant to CAS jurisprudence, private sports associations have a wide autonomy and margin of discretion when deciding on matters related to the competitions which they organize.” The CAS sided with FIFA and UEFA and rejected Russia’s cases in April, prompting FUR to appeal.,US Hybrid War Against Russia,Rick Sterling, a California-based investigative journalist who has written extensively on doping in sports, said he finds it unlikely that the CAS will rule in Russia's favor despite its case's "excellent arguments," among them the idea that you don't punish athletes for the actions of their nations.,"The US invaded Iraq and there was no denunciation let alone a punishment of athletes. The US, France and others overthrew the Libyan government, leaving a destroyed state, without criticism from the IOC or FIFA. So why are the Russian athletes being punished? One reason is because of built-in bias and prejudice. The IOC and FIFA are dominated by the West. It is very damaging that the IOC issued a recommendation that Russian athletes be discriminated against. This is a violation of the Olympic Charter against national discrimination," Sterling says.,"The US is openly and actively working to undermine Russia's image abroad, including in sports. They probably pre-coordinated the response to the special operation. Russian athletes are victims of the US hybrid war against Russia, as are Ukrainians and Russians," the journalist believes.,Football isn’t the only sport to have suffered from politicized bans instituted by world and national sporting authorities in the wake of the escalation of the Ukraine crisis, with tennis, basketball, hockey, skating and skiing competitions also affected. The arbitrary nature of the prohibitions has been exemplified by their random nature, with Russian athletes barred from FIFA play, for example, but allowed to compete in the 2022 Winter Paralympics, and at the US Open tennis tournament.,Top Tennis Stars in Favour of Penalising Wimbledon Over Ban on Russian Players, Report Says11 May, 11:40 GMT,The bans affecting Russia’s football players are just the latest instance of discrimination against the country’s athletes by international sporting bodies in recent years. In 2020, the CAS stripped Russia of its right to use its name, flag, and anthem at the Olympics and world championship events for two years, largely on the basis of the testimony of Grigory Rodchenkov, the former director of the Russian Anti-Doping Center laboratory-turned-informant to the World Anti-Doping who fled to the United States and testified about an alleged Russian “state-run doping program.” Russian officials denied the allegations and accused Rodchenkov of altering doping probe data of Russian athletes to fit the required narrative.。 讯 据民政部消息，民政部社会组织管理局通报5起社会团体分支机构、代表机构违法典型案例。 社会团体分支机构、代表机构是社会团体的重要组成部分，其运行质量直接关系到社会团体的整体效能，直接影响行业治理和社会服务的实际效果。近年来，社会团体违反规定设立分支机构、代表机构，或者对分支机构、代表机构疏于管理，造成严重后果的案件时有发生。有的在分支机构、代表机构下再设分支机构、代表机构；有的设立地域性分支机构；有的超出章程规定的宗旨和业务范围设立分支机构；有的对分支机构管理不严，致其出现违法违规问题等，扰乱了社会组织登记管理秩序，损害了社会组织公信力，侵害了人民群众合法权益。为发挥以案释法、以案示警作用，现选取部分典型案例予以通报。 案例一：中华人民共和国国史学会违反规定设立分支机构、代表机构案 中华人民共和国国史学会在其分支机构两弹一星历史研究分会下再设立无锡办事处、贵州办事处两个代表机构，承担联络会员单位、保障服务对象、组织相关活动等任务，该行为违反了《民政部关于贯彻落实国务院取消全国性社会团体分支机构、代表机构登记行政审批项目的决定有关问题的通知》第四条“社会团体不得设立地域性分支机构，不得在分支机构、代表机构下再设立分支机构、代表机构”的规定。2025年10月，依据《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第三十条第一款第五项的规定，民政部依法对中华人民共和国国史学会作出警告的行政处罚。 案例二：北京宜春企业商会违反规定设立分支机构案 北京宜春企业商会为搭建宜春高安市在京企业家平台，在商会下设高安分会。2023年12月，北京宜春企业商会在履行理事会、会员大会等程序后，决定成立高安分会。北京市民政局在年检中发现该违法情形后，向该商会提出整改要求。2025年1月，该商会按要求履行整改程序，召开理事会及会员大会，决议取消高安分会并停止铜鼓分会、袁州分会成立筹备工作。北京宜春企业商会设立高安分会的行为，违反了《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第十七条第二款“社会团体不得设立地域性的分支机构”的规定。
B | 2025年6月，依据《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第三十条第一款第五项的规定，北京市民政局依法对北京宜春企业商会作出警告的行政处罚。 案例三：山西省晋绥边区历史文化研究会超出业务范围开展活动、不按照规定办理变更登记、违反规定设立分支机构案 山西省晋绥边区历史文化研究会未召开理事会或常务理事会研究通过，违规设立分支机构岚县红色文化专委会；同时还存在超出章程规定的宗旨和业务范围进行活动、住所变更后未按规定向登记管理机关申请变更登记的行为。上述行为违反了《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第十八条第一款“社会团体的登记事项需要变更的，应当自业务主管单位审查同意之日起30日内，向登记管理机关申请变更登记”、《社会团体分支机构、代表机构登记办法》第三条“社会团体设立分支机构、代表机构应当按照章程的规定，履行民主程序”等规定。
C | 2026年3月，依据《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第三十条第一款第二项、第四项、第五项等规定，山西省民政厅依法对山西省晋绥边区历史文化研究会作出停止活动六个月的行政处罚，并责令撤换直接负责的主管人员。 案例四：项城防水协会违反规定设立分支机构案 项城防水协会擅自跨区域设立项城防水协会青海分会，后者在青海省西宁市违规发展会员并收取会费。上述行为违反了《社会团体登记管理条例》（2026年修订）第十七条第二款“社会团体不得设立地域性的分支机构”的规定。
D | 项城市民政局与业务主管单位联合对该协会负责人进行约谈，责令其限期整改。协会按要求撤销项城防水协会青海分会，并对该机构办公场所牌匾进行拆除，开展财务清算，收缴各类档案资料和印章。2026年7月，依据《社会团体登记管理条例》（2026年修订）第三十条第一款第六项的规定，河南省周口市项城市民政局依法对项城防水协会作出警告的行政处罚。
E | 案例五：河北省民营经济发展促进会对代表机构疏于管理案 河北省民营经济发展促进会下属代表机构雄安办事处未经该促进会同意，私自发展会员并收取费用。该促进会未严格履行监管主体责任，对其代表机构日常活动审批、过程管控等关键环节监管措施落实不到位，疏于管理造成严重后果。上述行为违反了《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第十七条第一款“ 社会团体的分支机构、代表机构是社会团体的组成部分，不具有法人资格，应当按照其所属于的社会团体的章程所规定的宗旨和业务范围，在该社会团体授权的范围内开展活动、发展会员”的规定。
F | 2026年2月，依据《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第三十条第一款第五项的规定，河北省民政厅依法对河北省民营经济发展促进会作出警告的行政处罚，并责令撤换代表机构负责人。
G | 版权申明：凡注有“”或电头为“”的稿件，均为独家版权所有，未经许可不得转载或镜像；授权转载必须注明来源为“”，并保留“”的电头。
H | 。
Current article:http://my16zr.chuanshaonianmokuanchouzhei.sbs/news/20260826_392.html
Published on:22:16:17